DBQ:
American Traitors or British Patriots?
Colonists Fight the British and Each Other
By Greg O'Brien
page 2
Part I: Short Answers
Document 1: Thomas Preston, Account of the Boston Massacre
Captain Thomas Preston's Account of the Boston Massacre (13 March 1770),
from British Public Records Office, C. O. 5/759. Reprinted in Merrill
Jensen (editor) English Historical Documents, Volume IX. (London, 1964)
vp.
750-53.
http://www.ukans.edu/carrie/texts/preston.html
"On Monday night about 8 o'clock two [British] soldiers were attacked and
beat. The guard iinformed me the town inhabitants were assembling to
attack
the troops. I saw the people in great commotion, and heard them use the
most cruel and horrid threats against the troops... So far was I from
intending the death of any person that I suffered the troops to go to the
spot where the unhappy affair took place without any loading in their
pieces (weapons); nor did I ever give orders for loading them. The mob
still increased and were more outrageous, striking their clubs or
bludgeons
one against another, and calling out, 'come on you rascals, you bloody
backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare, G-d damn you, fire and be
damned, we know you dare not,' and much more such language was used. At
this time I was between the soldiers and the mob. They
advanced to the points of the bayonets, struck some of them and even the
muzzles of the
pieces, and seemed to be endeavouring to close with the soldiers.... While
I
was thus speaking, one of the soldiers having received a severe blow with
a
stick, stepped a little on one side and instantly fired, and [while]
asking
him why he fired without orders, I was struck with a club on my arm... On
this a general attack was made on the men by a great number of heavy clubs
and snowballs being thrown at them, by which all our lives were in
imminent
danger, some persons at the same time from behind calling out, 'damn your
bloods-why don't you fire.' Instantly three or four of the soldiers fired,
one after another, and directly after three more in the same confusion and
hurry. The whole of this melancholy affair was transacted in almost 20
minutes.
I assured the men that my words were "don't fire, stop your
firing." In short, it was scarcely possible for the soldiers to know who
said fire, or don't fire, or stop your firing. I am, though perfectly
innocent, to expect but the loss of life in a very ignominious
[disgraceful] manner."
According to this author, who was most responsible for the Boston
Massacre?
Document 2: Paul Revere's Depiction of The Boston Massacre, 1770
http://earlyamerica.com/review/winter96/massacre.html
How does this portrayal of the Boston Massacre contrast with the
written account in Document 1?
Document 3: This newspaper excerpt from a 1779 edition of the "New York
Gazette" is signed "Candidus" and chances are good that it was penned by
loyalist author James "Candidus" Chalmers.
http://erols.com/candidus/propda.htm
"The rebels have hitherto been infamous for their wanton [reckless]
cruelties. Their brutal treatment of Governor Franklin (Royal Governor of
New Jersey), and many other persons of distinction whom I could mention,
--
their barbarity to loyalists in general, and at this present hour --
hanging men for acting according to the dictates of conscience -- whipping
men almost to death because they will not take up arms - - publicly
whipping even women, whose husbands would not join the militia -- their
confiscations, fines, and imprisonments; these things which they daily and
undoubtedly practice, very ill agree with the character of humanity so
lavishly bestowed on them by this writer. Nothing but a long, very long
series of conduct the reverse of this can wipe off the infamy [bad
reputation], which they hereby incurred [brought upon themselves]."
Did the rebels treat the loyalists fairly? What sort of punishments
could colonists expect if they were did not agree to support the
rebels?
Document 4: Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/patrick.htm
"The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For
my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or
slavery. Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of
war
and subjugation; Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the
world,
to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? Is life so dear,
or
peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as
for
me, give me liberty or give me death!"
This famous quote by Patrick Henry helped bring the South into the
Revolutionary War. What was his major complaint against the British in
this
speech?
Document 5:
"A Calm Address to our American Colonies," by John Wesley, founder of
Methodist Church, London England
http://www.indwes.edu/faculty/dbartley/hnr101/wesly_am.htm
"Nine in ten throughout England have no representative, no vote; yet they
are no slaves; they enjoy both civil and religious liberty to the utmost
extent. 'Who then is a slave?' Look into America, and you may easily see.
See that Negro, fainting under the load, bleeding under the lash! He is a
slave. And is there 'no difference' between him and his master? Yes; the
one is screaming, 'Murder! Slavery!' the other silently bleeds and dies!
'But wherein then consists the difference between liberty and slavery?'
Herein: You and I, and the English in general, go where we will, and enjoy
the fruit of our labors: This is liberty. The Negro does not: This is
slavery. Is not then all this outcry about liberty and slavery mere rant,
and playing upon words?"
How did John Wesley argue against the idea that taxation without
representation was of form of slavery? How might statements like his have
affected black slaves in the colonies?
Document 6: A Plan for the Union of Great Britain and the Colonies by
Joseph Galloway 1774
http://memory.loc.gov/learn/features/timeline/amrev/rebelln/galloway.html
Offered by Joseph Galloway of Pennsylvania; this was the first order of
business for the First Continental Congress. New York, Pennsylvania, and
New Jersey were especially concerned that the Colonies should reconcile
with Great Britain. This was their plan for compromise. The plan was
considered very attractive to most of the members, as it proposed a
popularly elected Grand Council which would represent the interests of the
colonies as a whole, and would be a continental equivalent to the English
Parliament. After a sincere debate, it was rejected by a six to five vote.
It may have been the arrival of the Suffolk County (Boston) resolutions
that killed it.
"Resolved, that this Congress will apply to His Majesty for a redress of
grievances under which his faithful subjects in America labor; and assure
him that the colonies hold in abhorrence the idea of being considered
independent communities on the British government, and most ardently
desire
the establishment of a political union, not only among themselves but with
the mother state, upon those principles of safety and freedom which are
essential in the constitution of all free governments, and particularly
that of the British legislature. And as the colonies from their local
circumstances cannot be represented in the Parliament of Great Britain,
they will humbly propose to His Majesty and his two houses of Parliament
the following plan, for a Proposed Union between Great Britain and the
Colonies of New Hampshire, the Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, the Three Lower
Counties on the Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Georgia."
How might the "Political Union" Joseph Galloway proposed be different
from the Declaration of Independence, which was adopted instead? What
significance is there in the closeness of the vote on this plan?
Document 7: Benedict Arnold's Open letter to Colonists, printed in The
London Chronicle October 21, 1780
http://earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/writings/arnold
"For the thousands who suffer under the tyranny of the
usurpers [rebel
leaders] in the revolted provinces ... my countrymen are
duped [fooled].
I
[lament] the tyranny and injustice with which [the rebel
leaders]
neglected to take their collective sentiments of the British
proposals of
peace. Rather than [accept] the insidious offers of France, a
monarchy
too
feeble to establish independence for the colonies, the enemy
of the
Protestant faith, I preferred those from Great Britain. It is
the
generous
intent of Great Britain to leave the rights and privileges of
the colonies
unimpaired, together with a perpetual exemption from
taxation, adding such
further benefits as may consist with the common prosperity of
the empire."
The name "Benedict Arnold" has become synonymous with "traitor". What
reasons does he give for defecting to the British Army? Are his reasons
sound?
PART II: Essay
Using the documents provided and your knowledge of American History, write
a well-organized essay developing a thesis from the documents in Part I
analyzing the differences between Americans who were loyalists and those
who were rebels. Use specific examples from the documents and from your
knowledge of history to explain the different reactions people had to the
conflict and to each other.
1
2
3
Certificate Program | Graduate Courses | Special
Events
Summer Workshops | After-School Workshops
About Us | Staff | Links | Contact Us
| Home
|