About CTAH Meet the CTAH Staff Links and Connections Contact the CTAH CTAH home page

 



Certificate Program

Graduate Program

Student Projects

Summer Workshops
Slavery, Civil War, Reconstruction
A Revolution, A Constitution, A Nation
Civil Rights Movement
Social and Political Change in the 19th Century
The U.S. and the World in the 20th Century

Teacher Projects

After-School Workshops

Book Reading Group

Special Events

 
DBQ: American Traitors or British Patriots?
Colonists Fight the British and Each Other
By Greg O'Brien

page 2


Part I: Short Answers

Document 1: Thomas Preston, Account of the Boston Massacre

Captain Thomas Preston's Account of the Boston Massacre (13 March 1770), from British Public Records Office, C. O. 5/759. Reprinted in Merrill Jensen (editor) English Historical Documents, Volume IX. (London, 1964) vp. 750-53.
http://www.ukans.edu/carrie/texts/preston.html
"On Monday night about 8 o'clock two [British] soldiers were attacked and beat. The guard iinformed me the town inhabitants were assembling to attack the troops. I saw the people in great commotion, and heard them use the most cruel and horrid threats against the troops... So far was I from intending the death of any person that I suffered the troops to go to the spot where the unhappy affair took place without any loading in their pieces (weapons); nor did I ever give orders for loading them. The mob still increased and were more outrageous, striking their clubs or bludgeons one against another, and calling out, 'come on you rascals, you bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare, G-d damn you, fire and be damned, we know you dare not,' and much more such language was used. At this time I was between the soldiers and the mob. They advanced to the points of the bayonets, struck some of them and even the muzzles of the pieces, and seemed to be endeavouring to close with the soldiers.... While I was thus speaking, one of the soldiers having received a severe blow with a stick, stepped a little on one side and instantly fired, and [while] asking him why he fired without orders, I was struck with a club on my arm... On this a general attack was made on the men by a great number of heavy clubs and snowballs being thrown at them, by which all our lives were in imminent danger, some persons at the same time from behind calling out, 'damn your bloods-why don't you fire.' Instantly three or four of the soldiers fired, one after another, and directly after three more in the same confusion and hurry. The whole of this melancholy affair was transacted in almost 20 minutes. I assured the men that my words were "don't fire, stop your firing." In short, it was scarcely possible for the soldiers to know who said fire, or don't fire, or stop your firing. I am, though perfectly innocent, to expect but the loss of life in a very ignominious [disgraceful] manner."
According to this author, who was most responsible for the Boston Massacre?



Document 2: Paul Revere's Depiction of The Boston Massacre, 1770
http://earlyamerica.com/review/winter96/massacre.html



How does this portrayal of the Boston Massacre contrast with the written account in Document 1?



Document 3: This newspaper excerpt from a 1779 edition of the "New York Gazette" is signed "Candidus" and chances are good that it was penned by loyalist author James "Candidus" Chalmers.
http://erols.com/candidus/propda.htm
"The rebels have hitherto been infamous for their wanton [reckless] cruelties. Their brutal treatment of Governor Franklin (Royal Governor of New Jersey), and many other persons of distinction whom I could mention, -- their barbarity to loyalists in general, and at this present hour -- hanging men for acting according to the dictates of conscience -- whipping men almost to death because they will not take up arms - - publicly whipping even women, whose husbands would not join the militia -- their confiscations, fines, and imprisonments; these things which they daily and undoubtedly practice, very ill agree with the character of humanity so lavishly bestowed on them by this writer. Nothing but a long, very long series of conduct the reverse of this can wipe off the infamy [bad reputation], which they hereby incurred [brought upon themselves]."
Did the rebels treat the loyalists fairly? What sort of punishments could colonists expect if they were did not agree to support the rebels?



Document 4: Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/patrick.htm
"The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery. Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
This famous quote by Patrick Henry helped bring the South into the Revolutionary War. What was his major complaint against the British in this speech?



Document 5: "A Calm Address to our American Colonies," by John Wesley, founder of Methodist Church, London England
http://www.indwes.edu/faculty/dbartley/hnr101/wesly_am.htm
"Nine in ten throughout England have no representative, no vote; yet they are no slaves; they enjoy both civil and religious liberty to the utmost extent. 'Who then is a slave?' Look into America, and you may easily see. See that Negro, fainting under the load, bleeding under the lash! He is a slave. And is there 'no difference' between him and his master? Yes; the one is screaming, 'Murder! Slavery!' the other silently bleeds and dies! 'But wherein then consists the difference between liberty and slavery?' Herein: You and I, and the English in general, go where we will, and enjoy the fruit of our labors: This is liberty. The Negro does not: This is slavery. Is not then all this outcry about liberty and slavery mere rant, and playing upon words?"
How did John Wesley argue against the idea that taxation without representation was of form of slavery? How might statements like his have affected black slaves in the colonies?



Document 6: A Plan for the Union of Great Britain and the Colonies by Joseph Galloway 1774
http://memory.loc.gov/learn/features/timeline/amrev/rebelln/galloway.html

Offered by Joseph Galloway of Pennsylvania; this was the first order of business for the First Continental Congress. New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey were especially concerned that the Colonies should reconcile with Great Britain. This was their plan for compromise. The plan was considered very attractive to most of the members, as it proposed a popularly elected Grand Council which would represent the interests of the colonies as a whole, and would be a continental equivalent to the English Parliament. After a sincere debate, it was rejected by a six to five vote. It may have been the arrival of the Suffolk County (Boston) resolutions that killed it.
"Resolved, that this Congress will apply to His Majesty for a redress of grievances under which his faithful subjects in America labor; and assure him that the colonies hold in abhorrence the idea of being considered independent communities on the British government, and most ardently desire the establishment of a political union, not only among themselves but with the mother state, upon those principles of safety and freedom which are essential in the constitution of all free governments, and particularly that of the British legislature. And as the colonies from their local circumstances cannot be represented in the Parliament of Great Britain, they will humbly propose to His Majesty and his two houses of Parliament the following plan, for a Proposed Union between Great Britain and the Colonies of New Hampshire, the Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, the Three Lower Counties on the Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia."
How might the "Political Union" Joseph Galloway proposed be different from the Declaration of Independence, which was adopted instead? What significance is there in the closeness of the vote on this plan?



Document 7: Benedict Arnold's Open letter to Colonists, printed in The London Chronicle October 21, 1780
http://earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/writings/arnold
"For the thousands who suffer under the tyranny of the usurpers [rebel leaders] in the revolted provinces ... my countrymen are duped [fooled]. I [lament] the tyranny and injustice with which [the rebel leaders] neglected to take their collective sentiments of the British proposals of peace. Rather than [accept] the insidious offers of France, a monarchy too feeble to establish independence for the colonies, the enemy of the Protestant faith, I preferred those from Great Britain. It is the generous intent of Great Britain to leave the rights and privileges of the colonies unimpaired, together with a perpetual exemption from taxation, adding such further benefits as may consist with the common prosperity of the empire."
The name "Benedict Arnold" has become synonymous with "traitor". What reasons does he give for defecting to the British Army? Are his reasons sound?



PART II: Essay

Using the documents provided and your knowledge of American History, write a well-organized essay developing a thesis from the documents in Part I analyzing the differences between Americans who were loyalists and those who were rebels. Use specific examples from the documents and from your knowledge of history to explain the different reactions people had to the conflict and to each other.

1 2 3



Certificate Program | Graduate Courses | Special Events

Summer Workshops | After-School Workshops

About Us | Staff | Links | Contact Us | Home