Sample Assignments
Sciences:
- Choose a topic related to class discussions (cell biology, applied physics, physical chemistry, etc.) and write a short literature review (10 pages) using at least 5 primary sources.
Humanities:
- Shakespeare: Choose one of the plays discussed in class, then choose a live/recorded performance of that play (can be a movie, limited series, etc.). Write a 5-page paper analyzing how the live performance interprets the play.
Sample Rubrics
Research Paper (7+ pages)
| Criteria | Excellent | Proficient | Developing | Unsatisfactory |
| Research & Argument |
- Thesis is insightful, debatable, and well-supported. - Exceptional source integration (credible, varied). - Flawless organization with transitions. |
- Thesis is clear but somewhat predictable. - Adequate sources, minor gaps in credibility/depth. - Mostly logical flow, occasional weak transitions. |
- Thesis is unclear or too broad. - Limited/weak sources. - Poor structure; ideas feel disconnected. |
- No identifiable thesis. - Lacks credible sources. - Disorganized; no coherence. |
| Written Communication |
- Engaging, polished prose; college-level style. - Persuasive and audience-aware. - Error-free mechanics (grammar, syntax). |
- Clear but occasionally wordy. - Attempts persuasion; some audience consideration. - Minor mechanical errors. |
- Unclear or repetitive. - Weak argumentation; little audience focus. - Frequent errors distract. |
- Confusing or unreadable. - No persuasive effort. - Errors impede understanding. |
| Supporting Evidence |
- Rich, relevant evidence tied to thesis. - Seamless source use (quotes/paraphrasing + analysis) |
- Sufficient evidence, but some may lack depth. - Sources integrated but analysis could be stronger. |
- Evidence is thin or off-topic. - Sources feel "dropped in" without analysis. |
- Little to no evidence. - Sources missing or misused. |
| Revision & Improvement |
- Substantial revisions improve argument, clarity, and mechanics. - Explicitly addresses instructor feedback. |
- Some meaningful revisions, but some issues remain. - Adequate response to feedback. |
- Minimal revisions (e.g., only grammar fixes). - Ignores key feedback. |
- No revisions. - Feedback disregarded. |